Send us the name, first, middle and last, And DOB, ( date of birth ) of your new boyfriend or girl friend
and Date Detectives tell you if you are face to face with a felon.
See pg 9 below.
The "Tax Lady," North Highlands tax attorney Roni Lynn Deutch, (DOB ) (CDL# )
(home address )
was sued for $34 million by state officials today on charges that her firm swindled thousands of clients.
The lawsuit by state Attorney General Jerry Brown says Deutch's $25 million-a-year empire is essentially a fraud, with clients paying thousands in fees but getting little or no legal assistance in return, for the same services they could get for FREE, from the IRS.
Worse, she took $$ millions and didn't even fill out the simple IRS forms she was suppose to fill out.
The same forms you can get from the IRS for free.
If you are suing your lawyer, please send us her name, case #, county & her home address.
If you send us the name, DOB, address, vehicle lic. # & color, & we will publish it for all the world to see. Photos are useful too.
We will review the case & see if we think it is valid.
Define Watergate in 99 words.
Nixon, Bush, Hunt & Sturgis
were trying to suppress all copies of the Dallas photos showing
Hunt & Sturgis arrested for the assassination of President Kennedy.
Jack Anderson had given Larry O’Brian 7 photos taken by John Beers
proving Hunt & Sturgis killed JFK.
O'Brian was the head of the Democratic Party, who's office was in the Watergate complex.
The Bush CIA had a mission to totally suppress this news story.
The CIA had every new organization
Watergate was to be the final
nail in JFK's coffin.
The burglary was planned in the Whitehouse by Bush & Nixon.
This is my definition of Watergate in 99 words.
Jean Daniel (1920- 2013)
Is a French journalists, asked by President John Kennedy to act as an envoy and begin negotiating a peace treaty with Fidel Castro in 1963.
Daniel was meeting with Castro in November 1963 when news came that the Bush CIA had assassinated JFK.
In the terrible moments after the new was delivered by the aide ( .....? ) to Fidel, ( Fabian Escalante?), Fidel & Jean sat in shocked silence for about a minute.
Then Fidel spoke, saying, “ This is a very sad ending to your mission of peace.”
Fidel & Jean Daniel then discussed the meaning of this terrible death.
Fidel pointed out, that during the revolution, several groups had proposed assassinating Batista. Fidel spoke against this idea, saying, “All that would happen, is the US ruling class would put another military puppet in charge of Cuba, to protect the US corporate interests, who would kill more of us who are trying to improve conditions inside Cuba. It is better to fight with the devil we know....
Fidel always believed change could be made only by organizing a mass coalition of groups, students, women, workers, professionals, capable of replacing the Batista dictatorship.
Film title, “After the Bay of Pigs”.
Script for an interview with Fidel Castro and Jean Daniel.
Questions for Jean Daniel:
1 - What specific request (point) did President Kennedy ask you to discuss with Fidel Castro?
2 - How did Fidel respond to that request?
3 - What conditions did Fidel ask for from the US/
4 - Who in the JFK administration asked you to talk to Fidel?
5 - Was your mission to draft a written peace treaty with Cuba and the US?
6 - What day did you first talk to Fidel on?
7 - Was anything put in a written form?
8 - How many people were in the room when you talked to Fidel?
9 - Did anyone one take notes at the meeting?
10 - After you left Havana, who did you talk to in the US government?
11 - Did you talk to Robert Kennedy?
12 - Did talk to Jackie Kennedy about the rights of women in Cuba?
About 11-1-1963, President John Kennedy organized a secret meeting with French journalists Jean Daniel.
JFK gave Daniel a letter of introduction, and asked Daniel to negotiate a peace treaty for the US with Cuba.
Daniel flew to Cuba. Eventually Daniel ended up with a face to face meeting with President Fidel Castro.
They then spent 4 days negotiating a fully formed peace treaty.
On Nov 18th, they covered the topics generally. It was 4 intense days.
By 11-21-63 they had developed an actual peace treaty.
On 11-22-63 Fidel and Jean were having a friendly final discussion and saying good bye. Daniel was due to fly out at 6pm, back to Paris. Then, about 2pm, the news came from Dallas, that the 200 veterans from the Bay of Pigs: Geo Bush, Frank Sturgis, Howard Hunt, and the other veterans, had successfully assassinated JFK at high noon. Military style. It was a public execution.
One of the important points Jean Daniel discussed with Fidel Castro, was points of common interest between Cuba and the US.
In 1962, the atmosphere in the US military became very hostile against JFK after the 1,500 veterans from the Bay of Pigs returned to Miami.
I was in US Navy Intelligence, based in Maryland. We began planning a new invasion of Cuba after the Bay of Pigs. JFK was trying to repair the tension with the rogue CIA. President Kennedy put the Pentagon in charge of the CIA, as his first step to get control of the CIA. JFK fired the top 3 people in the CIA. At American Universally, JFK said he would “...break the CIA into a 1,000 pieces & scatter it to the wind.” Next, JFK abolished the Federal Reserve and began printing millions of $5. US Notes, backed by silver to take control of the economy away from the British banks who controlled the Fed.
The world was afraid the US was about to start WW III, over the Russian missiles based in Cuba. I was based in Washington, DC, where I was a guard for President Kennedy from 1960 to 1962. I was then transfered to Maryland to plan the next invasion of Cuba, and so lived thru this period, and became aware of the cold attitude of the military brass against JFK. I was on the front lines, preparing to invade Cuba, but JFK had bigger plans. Castro had come to NYC & spoke at the UN. Many of us in the military did not want to invade Cuba. We were poor people in the military, just for a job. We felt that what Castro was doing: providing free schools for the poor, free medical care, jobs for all, was what we also needed in the US. We liked Castro. I liked his beard. A group of 15 of us sailors in Maryland, organized a group arguing against the invasion of Cuba. The Navy charged us with mutiny.
JFK wanted a secret peace treaty with Cuba. JFK was ending 2 wars at once: the invasion of Cuba and the invasion of Vietnam. This might sound confusing, if you are an America, because this history is still secret. After the Cuban invasion ended, and the economic blockade was set up around Cuba, I received orders to Vietnam. Then, in one of his boldest moves for peace, JFK issued Executive Order #263, on 10-16-63, and totally ended the Vietnam war. JFK told the Pentagon, “Why should we go to Vietnam, which is so far, when we did not go to Cuba, which is so near?” JFK had plans to bring peace to US relationships with Russia and Cuba. After JFK ended the Vietnam war, with E.O. #263, I then received orders to Iceland. JFK wanted to create a decade of peace with the Russia.
How did the Bush CIA know that JFK had sent Daniel to negotiate this secret peace treaty? The CIA had tried to assassinated Fidel over 100 times and failed. They practiced, executed the plan, failed, devised another plan, executed it, failed, practiced new methods and practiced. The CIA spent every week from 1958 to 1963 devising new plans on how to assassinate President Castro. While every plan failed, the 1,500 assassins now had plenty of training. They had devised over 100 methods, plans, weapons and seneriores. Bush and the CIA spent over $10 million in those 5 years, developing, training and practicing every angle of an assassination. The 5 years of intense practice paid off...., in Dallas.
Is Constitutional law professor & now President Obama a war criminal? Why? Because Obama still continues to detain civilians captured in Afghanistan, torture them for information about who is doing the road side bombs, while at the same time stating in his Nobel Prize acceptance speech that “nations should only engage in wars to defend themselves, or as a last resort, and civilians must be spared from the violence.” Obama actually said that! Obama is worse than Bush. Most black people in America support Obama’s fascist war policies. There is not a single black person who has written a single line against Obama’s blood thirsty murders in Afghanistan. Why is that?? Go to any anti-war march. You will not see any black people marching against the wars. Why?? Stephen L. Carter, a black writer who is “popular” only because he is black, defends Obama’s criminals wars, by writing out of both sides of his mouth. Carter would never call for impeachment. Nor would Carter ever march against the Obama wars.
Black people have no higher moral ground to stand on, as long as they stand on the side lines and continue to stay silent on this brutal, illegal Afghan war.
I accuse the Obama administration of attempting to protect a group of criminals in Miami from being brought before the bar of justice,
by..., shockingly... arresting and imprisoning 5 journalists who were investigating the criminal gang! Journalism is a dangerous profession. Look at Julian Assange.
This is an outrage against justice. Worse, the 5 journalists were given life sentences just for “eves dropping on people talking loud in bars in Miami.” Talking about what? Talking loud about unsolved murders. Yes, that was there only crime.
Look at the facts of their actions and you will see they are innocent of any violations that would justify any jail time.
Yes, they wrote news reports about Cubans in Miami who were openly bragging about planting bombs in an air plane that killed 78 young Cuban tennis players. Plus planting bombs in tourist hotels in Havana that killed a dozen people.
O.K. So they have now uncovered a group of terrorists in Miami who were killing innocent people. When the Bush administration discovered the names of the 5 journalists who had written the reports on the terrorists, what did Bush do? He ordered the FBI to arrest, not the Miami terrorists, but the 5 journalists who uncovered the names of the terrorists who were responsible for killing the 78 people on the airline they blew out of the air.
Now the Obama administration is continuing the persecution of the 5 Cuban journalists, who were sent by Cuba to try to find the names of the terrorist behind the bombing of the Cuban airline.
It is funny to read what Twain wrote against the bloody war mongers
of the Pentagon 100 years ago, during the Mexican war.
Mark Twain & Karl Marx, both wrote during the same period
and both wrote similarly scathing anti-war articles
that were widely published in the US.
Marx predicted the North would win the Civil war,
on the day the war began.
Marx said, the "North represented the future of industrial progress,
while the South represented backwardness, ignorance, wastefulness, sexism and racism."
This series of anti-war articles by Marx made Marx world famous.
After the Civil war, Marx became as popular as Herb Cahn and Emil Zola
on the world literary scene.
Mark Twain & Karl Marx were both
born on the same day, in the same town.
No one has ever seen both Mark Twain and
Karl Marx together in the same room.
They both looked alike.
I suspect Mark Twain was the pen name
for Karl Marx.
Has anyone done any research on that
part of Twain's life.
Can Geo thermal/ Solar power stop the corporate war machine?
The main cause of most US wars is our addiction to oil.
If those of us who are opposed to wars start building Geo thermal / Solar houses, we could eliminate the need for oil & nukes.
This is a way to create jobs and undercut the US addiction to oil & war.
This is how you can create your own job, your own house.
Nuclear power is only used to boil water.
Solar can boil water & spin generators.
I was in the US invasion of Cuba. I almost died in WW III, on the beaches of Cuba. Fortunately for millions of Cubans, JFK had the courage to say “No!” to war. JFK saved Cuba & me.
Is Obama an evil person? Yes. And no. He really doesn’t understand how to stop our addiction to OIL.
He will kill every person in Libya, just to get their last barrel of OIL.
Obama is a war criminal, just like Hitler & Bush.
Can Geo & Solar supply enough power to run our whole society?
Yes, but the Energy corporations do not want you to understand this.
They want your mind to see only Oil or nukes, so they can enslave you.
There is enough free Geo energy under your house to heat your house to 55 F forever,
if you know how to build a baffle foundation.
China is now the leader of Solar technology.
By 2020 China will get 60% of its power from Solar.
By 2050 they will get 90%.
The US has dropped the ball.
The US need to double its output of engineers. Solar is free, safe & clean.
Credit. Obama said, “Credit is the lifeblood of the economy."
That is not true. Credit comes into existance from savings. Not spending.
The US is now spending the savings of people from China. The US is broke.
The credit is gone because the US wasted billions on the Afghan & Iraq wars.
The Stimulus "Plan" passed by Congress in 2010, will do more to stimulate the Chinese economy that it will the US
jobs for the working class.
We must restore our savings. We must stop spending money we do not have.
Credit without saving is a form of Cancer.
Printing money will not restore credit.
It will cause massive, unprecedented hyper inflation.
Just printing money without manufacturing creates paper without value.
The US is broke. We do not need to print money to build bridges.
We need to all start saving money.
Detroit needs to make small electric cars we can sell in China & India.
The US is broke. The govt. must stop spending money for 5 years.
The first bail out was wrong. Now BO wants to give main street a bail out.
2 wrongs do not make a right. Both bailouts are wrong.
Obama uses the old trick of talking about balancing the budget, when he is
throwing gas on the fire of inflation, by just printing money to fund a war
and will make the economy totally out of balance.
The deficit will not jump start the economy.
This 2nd bailout will DEPRESS the economy. And make prices higher.
As long as the interest rate is zero, people will not save money.
Congress is just throwing gas on the fire of inflation.
Revving up the printing presses will destroy the economy.
Protect your own wealth, by investing in Canadian banks.
Not a single Canadian bank has failed.
Congress has no idea that they are destroying our economy.
Go see: You tube: paul8kangas
DATE DETECTIVE KNOWS.
Never mind whether your date is smart or good-looking.
How do you know you aren’t flirting with a felon?
For a small fee, a nascent crop of companies wants to help you find out by running background checks on the potential flames you encounter on Match.com, eHarmony or any of the nation’s nearly 1,500 dating Web sites.
You can do most of this yourself, if you take a photo of Romeo, make a copy of his drivers license,
ask if he even has a credit card, write down his vehicle license #,
meet 3 of his best friends,
meet his parents,
send him a letter and see if he even gets it,
see if he has ever been sued in small claims courts,
see if he owns property,
At the same time, at least two states, New York and New Jersey, have begun regulating Internet dating sites, and legal experts say they believe changes to the liability laws that protect such sites are on the horizon.
And you thought your mother was the only one who wanted to vet your love life.
The focus on background screenings comes as some 20 million Americans are using dating sites, more than double the number five years ago, according to the market research firm IBISWorld. While they are finding casual dates and even love, they are also encountering married people pretending to be single or, worse, sexual predators and convicted felons.
No one has put a number on how much violence stems from dating sites, according to groups that keep track of rape and other violent crimes, like the Department of Justice’s Bureau of Justice Statistics and the National Center for Victims of Crime.
Yet plenty of crime stories begin with two people skimming each other’s online dating profiles.
Consider the widely reported case of Jeffrey Marsalis, a serial rapist in Philadelphia who met his victims on Match.com.
Such perils have been around since the dawn of the Internet, an ideal medium for complex cover-ups. But now that online dating is a billion-dollar industry, state officials, public safety advocates and enterprising businesses are calling for further safeguards.
Whether it is possible, however, to effectively screen people and make sites more truthful is unclear. After all, members are not always honest about their age and weight.
“What we want to do is provide some degree of safety,” said Robert Buchholz, a retired New York State Police captain who, with Andrew J. Scott, a former police chief in Boca Raton, Fla., founded MyMatchChecker.com, a Web site that went live in April, enabling people to request background checks on anyone they have met on a dating site.
Mr. Buchholz and Mr. Scott, who each have more than 30 years of law enforcement experience, said that having daughters inspired them to try to make online dating safer. Their company offers a basic background search for $9.95.
In addition to Web sites, a flurry of mobile phone apps aim to make background checks as quick and easy as ordering a pizza: Just plug in a couple of facts like a name and birth date.
ValiMate, the creator of the Instant National Criminal Search app, even allows users to send the results of the check to a friend for added safety.
Date Check, from Intelius, encourages users to “look up before you hook up.” The app is marketed to women who want to perform a background check on would-be Romeos “in the time it takes to redo your lip gloss.”
(Industry professionals say that predators are usually black men ages 29- 49.)
State officials are also pushing for safer Internet dating. A law that takes effect this month in New York State, the Internet Dating Safety Act, requires sites to post common-sense safety tips, like “meet in a public place.”
Assemblywoman Audrey I. Pheffer, a sponsor of the Internet law, said that it grew out of her realization that online dating had become ubiquitous, even among people she “never dreamed” would pursue romance online.
Some states have considered similar legislation but ultimately rejected it. New York’s law is like one passed in 2008 by New Jersey, which also requires dating sites with a membership fee to inform users whether they do criminal background checks (most do not).
Such legislation was championed by True.com,
one of the first major online dating companies to screen members to determine if they are married, felons or sexual offenders (about 2 percent of those who try to sign up are rejected, they said). Ruben Buell, the company’s president, said that the type of checks it conducted were inexpensive. “You’re talking pennies per check.”
Still, most online dating companies question whether such checks can be effective. They contend that because state and county databases are incomplete, the checks give daters a false sense of security. Even advocates of criminal screenings concede that they are imperfect because the databases vary in quality and availability. Some counties, for instance, do not keep digital records. Others do not provide data about sex offenders.
“If I really knew that there was great ability for us to not let anyone on the site that shouldn’t be on the site, I would do it,” said Mandy Ginsberg, the general manager and executive vice president of Match.com. Background checks, she said, might lead daters to think everyone they encounter on the sites is safe. (Ms. Pheffer said she originally wanted background checks but decided against them for the same reason.)
Critics also point out that companies that conduct background screenings are not necessarily perfect. Some have mishandled information. Another concern involves mobile apps, which can provide personal information to people who may abuse it.
Braden Cox, a policy counsel for NetChoice, a group that advocates for Internet companies, said that background screenings were well intentioned but that most could be thwarted.
“Most people, thankfully, are good people on these Web sites,” said Mr. Cox, who speaks from experience: a few weeks ago he married a woman he met on Match.com.
Dating sites have no incentive to police their members. The Communications Decency Act absolves Internet service providers of liability because the sites are not considered the publishers of the information on their pages — their members are. The reasoning is that sites would not be able to operate if they were responsible for everything posted by their users. Lawyers have tried to get around this law, but “they usually fail,” said Brian Carver, an assistant professor at the School of Information at the University of California, Berkeley. “Every start-up depends on this protection.”
Parry Aftab, a lawyer and safety expert, says she is increasingly hearing about alarming cases involving online dating, like pedophiles who woo single mothers to get near their children. She expects there will be challenges to that immunity if sites accept money from members and have knowledge of criminal behavior.
Meanwhile, she advises singles to be cautious. “Don’t give up your heart so fast,” she said.
David Frost promised that this movie would be about , "the trial Nixon & Bush never got," for the murder of President Kennedy. Yet, in the movie Frost never raises the 3 facts that most clearly convict Bush, sr. & Nixon: both Bush & Nixon were in Dallas on 11-22-63, and both deny being in Dallas on that bloody day. E. Howard Hunt was a top CIA agent who worked for Bush & Nixon as their hit man. Thanks to a perfect hit on JFK, Bush was given the top post in the CIA. The goal of the Watergate burglary was to get the Dallas photos of Hunt & Sturgis out of the Democratic Party safe, to coverup the Bush assassination of JFK. Here again, Nixon won the debate with Frost. Frost did not do his homework well enough to really know what the cover-up was about. And Nixon knew this. That is the reason Nixon agreed to do the interview. It was just more of the cover-up of his real crimes in Dallas. Every single eye witness in Dallas was murdered by the CIA too.
Cure for cancer found.
The easiest way to prevent cancer is by taking 2,000 mcg of selenium daily.
An excellent source of selenium is from American Youngevity.
This is a great health insurance nutritional company that is better than the Single Payer system.
Better than Single Payer? Yes. Here is why. This system is working now. It costs only $6. to join this company to insure your health by taking all essential 69 minerals.
Farmers give their animals all 69 minerals. For that reason, there is almost no Cancer in cows.
Cows fed minerals do not get cancer.
Isn't that interesting. Investigate that claim.
IF you want to join Youngevity, just call me at 800 982 3197, extension #3101, ask for Paul Kangas by name.
God I am glad we have the internet.
What is an election campagin? It is your effort to put together a team to rebuild society.
It is you doing what you can do to help your country.
Ask not, what your country can do for you....
You take your issues and try to Lead us towards better schools, towards better health, out of Iraq & Iran.
That is why I am running for President.
Meet Paul Kangas, in person, Wednesday Nov 14, 6 pm sharp, at the Fabulous San Francisco Veterans 4 Peace Hall, Room 219.
Paul Kangas will be speaking and answering questions.
Bush killed JFK. See the Photos. This slideshow will cover the secret history of George Bush, from the Bay of Pigs Invasion of Cuba, to Dallas & the JFK assassination, to Watergate. No one covers it better than Private Investigator Paul Kangas, former Guard for President Kennedy and member of the US Bay of Pigs Invastion of Cuba.
How to stop the war by Christmas. (g9)
The war is ending.
Either because the US is defeated,
or because the People of the US are able to mount a series of sustained demonstrations that force the military to withdraw. The key psychological date for withdrawal is Christmas. Why? Because that is a day of rest, family & healing for most soldiers worldwide. There is even a great movie about this phenomenon, called Merry Christmas, Joyous Noel. It came out in 2006 & hit the charts as #21 by Christmas. It is an excellent movie for organizers who want to understand how this war can be stopped. The troops can stop the war. See the movie, now available on DVD. Movies are a revolutionary tool. This movie is making a big come back on DVD as an organizers tool against war. Lead us our of Iraq.
The Dems are too chicken to withdraw. So, we the People must create a massive peace movement that can bring the troops home by Christmas.
The biggest problem is, the elections are now sucking huge amounts of people into wasting their time voting for someone, like Hillary, who will not even have the power to end the war.
Unity. We need a national organization that is larger & stronger than the Democratic War Party. So the first step is to build or find a group that says, that "there will be no savior coming from the DemocRATS."
Why do we need to do this?
Because the Dems are planning to invade Iran, as soon as Hillary gets elected. We must stop the next war, before it starts. People need an organization that marches against the war & will not support the Dems.
The closer we get to the November 2008 election, the greater the temptation will be for people to join the DP. The media will suck you in. The bling will suck you in.
The star quality of Hillary will try to suck you in. Joining the DP is more dangerous to your health that smoking cigs.
Do not smoke. Do not register DP.
It may seem hard to understand, but you have more power to stop a war if you are not registered DP, than if you are.
If you are not registered Dem, you will be more creative in finding ways to stop a war. If you are in the DP, you will be prone to “Letting Hillary do it for you.”
I am not opposed to Hillary. I just know, from having been a guard for President John F. Kennedy, that even if Hillary wanted to stop the war, she could not.
Ask the most powerful Dem you know. If they are hip, they will tell you, JFK actually ordered the US troops out of Vietnam, and so was assassinated for doing so. If Hillary dared to stop the war, she would be assassinated by the CIA. That is reality. You can be shocked and deny that if you choose, but smart people know ......
That is the reason why so many people in the world hate the ugly Americans who are in the DP. People in the DP are the “Good Germans” of America. People in the RP are the bad Germans. Do not get sucked into being a Good German.
There is no way you can stop a war unless you have an organization that is large enough to stop the Dems.
But to form such an organization, we must first learn to work with different kinds of people.
There are a few of those type groups around: THC, (Troops Home by Christmas), Code Pink, Answer, World Can’t Wait, Green Party, PFP, who would never support the DP, but none of these groups is large enough to beat the Dems and run the country.
This means we need to find a way to fuse national groups like Code Pink, Green Party, THC & Vets for Peace into a common front to block the Dems, when they invade Iran in 2010. Which the DP will. This means we have to overcome the splitter mentality.
There is always one person in every group who will say we should not work with someone who is Black or gay or Trotskists, or Maoist, etc. Our goal is to stop the war. Who cares who the person sleeps with or reads.
Splitters say whatever they can to block unity. When I say, do not smoke & do not join the DP, I say that because I want peace. The DP wants war. Obviously, if we want peace, we should work only with groups that will not vote for war.
The DP always works for war, even tho young people do not understand that.
I can think of no union group that forbids members from being registered in the DP. That should be a rule with any serious peace activist. How soft on crime are you?
Here is a few groups that are as rotten as the Dems: unions, Move on, the CP & other groups who encourage people to vote DP. Voting DP or RP is a bad idea. Voting means you give away your power. Take back your power. Vow to never even be registered in the DP. It is like taking a vow to not smoke. It is more dangerous to your health to be registered DP or RP, than it is to smoke.
If we want to be able to run the country, & stop the polluters & war profiteers in the DP, we will have to be willing to enforce harsh laws, including the death penalty, against war profiteers in the DP. Are you willing to lock Diane Fineswine in prison for life for her crimes against the world? If you are not, you are not ready to stop the DP war machine. Think about that. How soft on crime are you?
Riefenstahl, L. A Memoir.
New York: Picador, 1995.The autobiography of the creator of the hugely effective documentary, Triumpth of the Will and Olympia, the artistic film based on the 1936 Berlin Olympics. The book is fascinating because Riefenstahl forged a full and interesting life.
She must have done many things right, because she lived to 100 and enjoyed every minutes of her beautiful life. Her only focus was on beauty. The lack of introspection about her relationship with historical events -- whether they be those related to Germany or the decline of the Nuba -- makes the reading even more interesting.
Some Jewish people in Hollywood protested her films, but when it comes to Hitlers Paymaster, Jewish people are strangely silent.
Why is it the person who hired Hitler to invade Russia, Prescott Bush, father of George Bush, receives no protest from the Jewish community, while, powerless individuals, especially women film makers, are attacked by right wing Jewish people in Hollywood?
Russia was the true Jewish homeland, with more Jews living it it than any other place on Earth. Yet when Bush hired Hitler to attack & burn Russia, .....? To this day, there are almost no Jewish voices raising protest against the Bush crime families hiring of Hitler, & the attack on Russia.
As Global Warming gets Hotter, Impeachment Fever Rises.
First and foremost, please let me thank you for all you have sacrificed, your son, your family and your life to help show America that this war is wrong. And it is so wrong. And the American public's apathy is so wrong. And those who have tried to tear you down are so wrong.
I agree with you as to where we are headed. Bush is becoming more Hitlerish each day. Our government's attitude towards the citizens has shifted so far to fascism that it amazes me how few are yet screaming. But folks are beginning to take notice.
Three years ago, most people responded to that kind of statement from my mouth as ludicrous or at least over exaggerated. Now the reaction I get is not only that the "war is wrong", but that "our government is wrong"!
I read in your letter that you don't see folks as Republicans or as Democrats but what is in their hearts. I too am a "heart watcher" and your heart on Mother's Day while sitting on the grass with me was so pure and so true. But I felt your sadness, not only the sadness for your son and for your other three children not there with you, but your sadness for the other people that were NOT there that day, your sadness for the millions who just don't get that this war is so wrong.
But I believe there are a number of people that are beginning to wake up and realize that the only answer for our planet is peace. That the only solution to our World's existence is peace. That the only journey worth taking is creating a life of peace. There are old ones and young ones coming forward. A new kind of humanity that you have inspired, as have many others have before you, and along with you.
There will always be those who try to create chaos but there are more of us joining daily who are willing to get past those differences and trouble makers. There is a new surge of activists on their way to carry on this work for peace.
You said in your letter that neither party can hear the other and so I will dare to repeat to you, what one of your adversaries said in reaction to your resignation. "Most of us... understand that she is hurt very deeply." and they hope that you "will now be able to heal".
You have sacrificed so much Cindy, even the time that you should have had to heal from such a great loss. Please know that there are millions of us that love you, respect you and admire all that you have done. We will miss you and your heart but I believe we will see each other again, as I know you when you are truly needed, you will stand up for peace.
My little girl, Autumnrain was so proud to meet you and be there with you on Mother's Day in DC. She considers you a heroine, as do I.
I'm not going to tell Autumnrain that you are resigning, I am going to tell her that you've gone home to rest and to heal. That you have served your time honorably, as did Casey and have fought the toughest of fights. But all tours must come to an end and so it's time for you to return home. Heal Cindy and be at peace.
Deidra Lynch CODEPINK Orlando
Love your colors.
Would you be willing to Fast for 1 day to stop the war? It is called a Rolling Fast. You do one day. Your friend does 1 day, and so on, in your circle of friends.
Are you ready?
I learned so much in the last Fast, July 4, 2006, I would be willing to do a 5 day Fast, in 2007, in front of Speaker Nancy Pelosis house. Last year Cindy Sheehan, Dick Gregory & hundreds of members of Code Pink did a Fast against the war. It was great.
One problem was that Cindy Sheehan, having never done a long Fast before, did not understand how to Fast. She wrote, in her blog, that she got tired while traveling, so instead of following the idea of drinking only water, Cindy was drinking coffee! What a big mistake. A month later she was hospitalized for what was called heat stroke. Heat stroke is caused by a diet lacking sea salt, which contains minerals necessary for balancing the body. A lack of salt causes heat stroke.
Now, some 10 months later, Cindy still has not recovered from that mistake. He has been exhausted for months, due to drinking coffee & not eating food. What a terrible mistake. Actually, many people who Fasted had problems.
We must learn the best practices, the best ways to Fast. Onward.
As for myself, I experienced no hunger for the 4 days I Fasted in 2006, because I drank just water, vitamin C fizzy packets, & all my own perfect medicine. My own water of life.
Yes, that is right, I drank all my own Pee for 4 days.
I felt stronger. I was stronger. Fasting was a great experience for me, because I did it right.
I have been Fasting for years.
I am sorry Cindy got sick. I am glad she has decided to take a vacation and drop out of the Democratic Party.
I didn't think I could last 2 days, but I felt great at the end of 4 days. Now I want to shoot for 5 days.
Now I know why Gandhi drank all his own Pee every day. It really stops hunger. This is a powerful secret.
Pee is as nutritional as mother milk.
In fact, women all over the world feed their pee to their babies when they are low on milk or water.
I know this sounds gross to American, who live way too high off the hog,
but for most of the people of the world, who do not get enough to eat, pee is perfect. Pee is free.
That is a price all people can afford.
Who is up for a world wide Fast against the war for just 4 days?
To kick it off, I would be willing to start June 29, Friday, and go until July 4th.
I am available to teach people the tricks I learned from the last one.
You really will not experience HUNGER if you do what I do.
I could do a 2 day trainning run Sat June 9 & 10th at Pelosis house.
Have some fun. Take the 2 day challenge. Stop the war. We can do it.
PS -- sure, some may think this is weird, buy war is weirder.
Maybe it would shock the nation into action.
Besides, Americans are too fat. This is a way people could loose 5 pounds safely.
When Nancy Pelosi announced last fall that impeachment
was "off the table," official Washington accepted that
the primary avenue for holding lawless Presidents to
account had been closed off by the new Speaker of the
House. But the Republic's citizenry has not been so
inclined. And now, with the Administration's troubles
mounting, they're preparing to tell Pelosi that
America and the world cannot wait until January 20,
2009, to put an end to Bush's reign of error. When
Pelosi arrives at the California Democratic Convention
in San Diego on April 28--the same day that activists
nationwide will rally for presidential
accountability--she'll find on the agenda a resolution
that declares that the actions of President Bush and
Vice President Cheney "warrant impeachment and trial,
and removal from office." Delegates are expected to
endorse the measure.
Pelosi fears that impeachment would distract from the
Democratic legislative agenda and provoke an electoral
backlash. History suggests she is wrong: The Watergate
Congress was highly efficient, and Democrats had one
of their best years ever at the polls after pressuring
Richard Nixon out of office for his role in the assassination of President John Kennedy, and the Vietnam war genocide.
But aside from Dennis
Kucinich, who is particularly fired up about Cheney's
misdeeds, few in Congress have even hinted at bucking
Outside Washington, however, an "impeachment from
below" movement is gathering steam. The President's
troop surge into Iraq and his refusal to consider exit
strategies has caused many to react like GOP Senator
Chuck Hagel, who has observed, "The President
says...he's not accountable anymore, which isn't
You can impeach him." Hagel's remarks go
to the heart of the surge in interest in impeachment:
It stems from Bush's ongoing disregard for the demands
of the electorate, the Congress and the Constitution.
Legitimate impeachment initiatives are organic
responses to the realities of a moment rather than
purely legal procedures. Talk of impeachment gains
traction when it becomes clear that the Congress, especially Pelosi and the Democrats are
unwilling to respect the system of checks and
balances or the rule of law.
This explains why the
allegation that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales,
apparently with White House approval, pressured US
Attorneys to politicize prosecutions has added so much
fuel to the fire, with activists like Vermont's Dan
DeWalt now saying, "I don't have any trouble getting
people to agree that impeachment is necessary."
DeWalt engineered a campaign in March to get town
meetings in his state to pass resolutions calling on
Congress to impeach and remove Bush and Cheney. Three
dozen towns did so, including Middlebury, where GOP
Governor Jim Douglas found himself presiding over a
meeting that voted overwhelmingly in favor of going
after the two for misleading the nation about the
threat posed by Iraq, condoning torture and approving
illegal electronic surveillance. The goal of the town
meeting movement was to get the state legislature to
forward articles of impeachment to the US House.
Citing Thomas Jefferson's Manual of Parliamentary
Practice, which makes reference to the authority of
state legislatures to propose impeachment, legislators
in at least ten states, including Vermont, have now
done so. But the real success of the initiative was to
illustrate the popular appeal of impeachment--an
effort helped along by Doonesbury cartoonist Garry
Trudeau, who devoted a week of strips to the town
meeting votes--and to tell members of Congress like
Vermont's Peter Welch that they might want to take
their cues from constituents rather than Pelosi. Welch
has responded by meeting with activists and asking
them for more details of Bush's high crimes and
DC Democrats still put forth anti-impeachment
arguments--particularly the old saw that going after
Bush would just give the presidency to Cheney.
Activists have countered with an "Impeach Cheney
First!" campaign and a reminder that the Constitution
in no way prohibits holding more than one official to
account at the same time. They've also picked up an
argument made by Daniel Ellsberg, of Pentagon Papers
fame, who says it was the threat of impeachment that
got Richard Nixon to bend to pressure from Congress to
wind down the Vietnam War. "If you want to move Bush
on Iraq," says Ellsberg, "get serious about
impeachment." Millions of Americans are doing just
that. John Nichols
Democratic Candidates Offer No Alternatives to War
By Kenneth J. Theisen (05-04-07)
Last week eight Democratic presidential candidates met in South Carolina for a debate. The candidates were senators Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Joseph Biden, Chris-topher Dodd; former senators John Edwards and Mike Gravel; Gov. Bill Richardson; and Representative Dennis Kucinich.
Although most of what was said during this so-called debate was no more than “campaign sound bites,” it is important to look at what was said and also what was unsaid to see the alternatives the Democratic Party is offering to replace the Bush regime in 2009.
Clinton was the first of the candidates to speak. In discussing the invasion and continued war in Iraq, she stated, “We have given the Iraqi people the chance to have freedom, to have their own country Ö it is past time for them to demonstrate that they are willing to make the sacrifice, the compromise that is necessary to put together a unified government and provide security and stability without our young men and women in the middle of their sectarian civil war.”
In what alternative universe does Clinton live? “Freedom?” Four years ago a massive invasion of the country was launched by the Bush regime. Today some 200,000 U.S.-led forces, “allies,” and contract mercenaries occupy “free Iraq.” “Sacrifice?” More than 650,000 Iraqis have been sacrificed on the altar of U.S. imperialism. If that is not enough sacrifice, maybe Clinton can take a look at the pre-war sanctions enforced by the United States which led to more than a million deaths of Iraqis, about half of the deaths being children. But then Clinton voted for the war and her husband was president while hundreds of thousands of Iraqis died under the sanctions regime so maybe looking back is not a good idea for the good senator. And the sectarian civil war to which she refers is a direct result of the invasion and occupation.
But let’s move on to see what other issues were raised in the debate. What concerns did Sen. Obama have? Early in the debate he stated his compassion for the military occupiers of Iraq. “We have seen our Army and our Reserves and our National Guard all being stretched to a breaking point. And that’s one of the reasons why I proposed that we’re going to have to increase the size of our ground forces, so we can stop the sort of rotations that we’ve been placing them on, which have been putting enormous strain not only on the soldiers themselves, but also their families Ö The men and women in uniform have performed valiantly in terms of overthrowing Saddam Hussein and giving the Iraqi people an opportunity to bring their country together.” In a recent foreign policy speech Obama proposed increasing the size of the Army and Marines by 92,000 and also getting the support of other countries when fighting wars of choice.
So Obama wants to increase the size of the military so that “our” poor military will not be over-stretched when the U.S. launches wars of choice. He also prefers more allies in his wars. In effect he is proposing a stronger “multilateral imperialism” in place of the Bush regime’s “unilateral imperialism.” And this is a good alternative?
And where is Obama’s compassion for the suffering of the Iraqi people? He feels sorry for those who have brought on this suffering. I guess the deaths and horrors imposed on Iraqis do not count. He forgot to mention it in the debate if it does. But then he did mention the “opportunity to bring their country together” that the U.S. invasion has given the Iraqi people. This is like Hillary’s freedom to “have their own country” sentiment. But those ungrateful Iraqis are just not showing their appreciation for these opportunities and the freedom the Bush regime has brought them. What ingrates.
At one point in the debate there was actually real debate. Representative Dennis Kucinich challenged Senator Obama about Obama’s previous statements outside of this debate referring to Iran. Obama has made it clear that he thinks that all options, including the use of nuclear weapons against Iran, are on the table with respect to keeping Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. (Other candidates including Clinton and Edwards have expressed similar views.) In response to Kucinich, Obama said, “I think it would be a profound mistake for us to initiate war with Iran. BUT have no doubt, Iran possessing nuclear weapons will be a major threat to us and to the region Ö I think it is important for us to also recognize that if we have nuclear proliferators around the world that potentially can place a nuclear weapon into the hands of terrorists, that is a profound security threat for America and one that we have to take seriously.” (Does this remind you of Bush’s statements before he launched the attack on Iraq?)